From loic.chanel at telecomnancy.net  Mon Oct 26 10:59:07 2015
From: loic.chanel at telecomnancy.net (=?UTF-8?B?TG/Dr2MgQ2hhbmVs?=)
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 11:59:07 +0100
Subject: Red Hat package signature
Message-ID: <CAEg_P-JOLkLKamU=uGkUVrxoBz=DNQET+MABxe6OBzH4X=GiFA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi all,

As I manage the patch management platform of my company, I have been asked
if there was a reason Varnish packages are not signed, and I did not know
what to answer.
Is there a specific reason for this, or could this packages be signed for
the upcoming versions ?

Thanks in advance for your answers,


Lo?c

Lo?c CHANEL
System & virtualization engineer
TO - XaaS Ind - Worldline (Villeurbanne, France)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/vinyl-dist/attachments/20151026/cc2694b0/attachment.html>

From lkarsten at varnish-software.com  Mon Oct 26 16:47:23 2015
From: lkarsten at varnish-software.com (Lasse Karstensen)
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 17:47:23 +0100
Subject: Red Hat package signature
In-Reply-To: <CAEg_P-JOLkLKamU=uGkUVrxoBz=DNQET+MABxe6OBzH4X=GiFA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEg_P-JOLkLKamU=uGkUVrxoBz=DNQET+MABxe6OBzH4X=GiFA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20151026164722.GA13017@immer.varnish-software.com>

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:59:07AM +0100, Lo?c Chanel wrote:
> As I manage the patch management platform of my company, I have been asked
> if there was a reason Varnish packages are not signed, and I did not know
> what to answer.
> Is there a specific reason for this, or could this packages be signed for
> the upcoming versions ?

Hi.

Which packages are you referring to? (URLs)

The goal is that all Varnish Cache packages should be signed.

-- 
Lasse Karstensen
Varnish Software AS



From lkarsten at varnish-software.com  Thu Oct 29 11:47:44 2015
From: lkarsten at varnish-software.com (Lasse Karstensen)
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 12:47:44 +0100
Subject: Varnish Cache contributor goodies (free!)
Message-ID: <20151029114743.GA30903@immer.varnish-software.com>

Hi all.

For a while now I've been trying to put together some
free goodies for our contributors.

Specificly this means a branded coffee mug and a Varnish Cache
contributor T-shirt, and we will deliver/ship it to you for free.

The underlaying idea is to show our appreciation for the great
work being done by the community. This will only be available to
contributors.

More information and a registration form for your shipping
address can be found here:

   https://www.varnish-cache.org/contributor

We aim to ship the first batch in the beginning of December 2015.

-- 
Lasse Karstensen
Varnish Software AS



From loic.chanel at telecomnancy.net  Fri Oct 30 15:56:11 2015
From: loic.chanel at telecomnancy.net (=?UTF-8?B?TG/Dr2MgQ2hhbmVs?=)
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:56:11 +0100
Subject: Red Hat package signature
In-Reply-To: <20151026164722.GA13017@immer.varnish-software.com>
References: <CAEg_P-JOLkLKamU=uGkUVrxoBz=DNQET+MABxe6OBzH4X=GiFA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20151026164722.GA13017@immer.varnish-software.com>
Message-ID: <CAEg_P-JVu+shfdf=xrczpWpu5_w+5mZEMR2M2-Ng65X2ru4Vig@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

I am referring to these packages :
http://repo.varnish-cache.org/redhat/varnish-3.0/el6/
Good thing to know :)

Regards,


Lo?c

Lo?c CHANEL
System & virtualization engineer
TO - XaaS Ind - Worldline (Villeurbanne, France)

2015-10-26 17:47 GMT+01:00 Lasse Karstensen <lkarsten at varnish-software.com>:

> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:59:07AM +0100, Lo?c Chanel wrote:
> > As I manage the patch management platform of my company, I have been
> asked
> > if there was a reason Varnish packages are not signed, and I did not know
> > what to answer.
> > Is there a specific reason for this, or could this packages be signed for
> > the upcoming versions ?
>
> Hi.
>
> Which packages are you referring to? (URLs)
>
> The goal is that all Varnish Cache packages should be signed.
>
> --
> Lasse Karstensen
> Varnish Software AS
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/vinyl-dist/attachments/20151030/103ed686/attachment.html>

From lkarsten at varnish-software.com  Fri Oct 30 18:12:09 2015
From: lkarsten at varnish-software.com (Lasse Karstensen)
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 19:12:09 +0100
Subject: Red Hat package signature
In-Reply-To: <CAEg_P-JVu+shfdf=xrczpWpu5_w+5mZEMR2M2-Ng65X2ru4Vig@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEg_P-JOLkLKamU=uGkUVrxoBz=DNQET+MABxe6OBzH4X=GiFA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20151026164722.GA13017@immer.varnish-software.com>
 <CAEg_P-JVu+shfdf=xrczpWpu5_w+5mZEMR2M2-Ng65X2ru4Vig@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAC_NFvR8WovAxauSjphozqOOeNz2vvr9MsWsNtzSmo8rKxyqgw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi.

Varnish 3.0 is end of life.

-Lasse

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Lo?c Chanel <loic.chanel at telecomnancy.net>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am referring to these packages :
> http://repo.varnish-cache.org/redhat/varnish-3.0/el6/
> Good thing to know :)
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Lo?c
>
> Lo?c CHANEL
> System & virtualization engineer
> TO - XaaS Ind - Worldline (Villeurbanne, France)
>
> 2015-10-26 17:47 GMT+01:00 Lasse Karstensen <lkarsten at varnish-software.com
> >:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:59:07AM +0100, Lo?c Chanel wrote:
>> > As I manage the patch management platform of my company, I have been
>> asked
>> > if there was a reason Varnish packages are not signed, and I did not
>> know
>> > what to answer.
>> > Is there a specific reason for this, or could this packages be signed
>> for
>> > the upcoming versions ?
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> Which packages are you referring to? (URLs)
>>
>> The goal is that all Varnish Cache packages should be signed.
>>
>> --
>> Lasse Karstensen
>> Varnish Software AS
>>
>
>


-- 
<http://www.varnish-software.com/>*Lasse Karstensen*
Software engineer | Varnish Software AS
Email: lkarsten at varnish-software.com
We Make Websites Fly!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/vinyl-dist/attachments/20151030/bdcfe825/attachment.html>