From tfheen at varnish-software.com  Fri Oct  1 12:56:00 2010
From: tfheen at varnish-software.com (Tollef Fog Heen)
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:56:00 +0200
Subject: Debian Package for 2.1.2
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikOo8R_MwDZ7g4O40q6GTStuYQ1uydPs3MrwOKU@mail.gmail.com>
	(Eran Sandler's message of "Thu, 13 May 2010 17:18:46 +0300")
References: <AANLkTikOo8R_MwDZ7g4O40q6GTStuYQ1uydPs3MrwOKU@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <87zkuy6pi7.fsf@qurzaw.linpro.no>

]] Eran Sandler 

(Old mail, I know, but still)

| Does anyone know who is the usual package maintainer for Debian? I would
| like to know the package status for Varnish 2.1.2.

Maintainer: Varnish Package Maintainers <pkg-varnish-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org>

is the maintainer field of the Varnish package in Debian.  IIRC,
ssm at debian.org has been doing most of the heavy lifting there.

-- 
Tollef Fog Heen
Varnish Software
t: +47 21 54 41 73



From des at des.no  Thu Oct 21 15:14:19 2010
From: des at des.no (=?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?=)
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:14:19 +0200
Subject: rst2man
Message-ID: <868w1r7f3o.fsf@ds4.des.no>

The tarball contains pre-generated man pages, but 'make install' only
installs two of them (varnishadm and varnishsizes).  The rest are hidden
by an "if HAVE_RST2MAN" in the corresponding Makefile.am.  Is this an
oversight?

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav - des at des.no



From tfheen at varnish-software.com  Mon Oct 25 08:30:25 2010
From: tfheen at varnish-software.com (Tollef Fog Heen)
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:30:25 +0200
Subject: rst2man
In-Reply-To: <868w1r7f3o.fsf@ds4.des.no> ("Dag-Erling =?utf-8?Q?Sm=C3=B8rg?=
	=?utf-8?Q?rav=22's?= message of "Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:14:19 +0200")
References: <868w1r7f3o.fsf@ds4.des.no>
Message-ID: <87pquyhdy6.fsf@qurzaw.linpro.no>

]] Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav 

| The tarball contains pre-generated man pages, but 'make install' only
| installs two of them (varnishadm and varnishsizes).  The rest are hidden
| by an "if HAVE_RST2MAN" in the corresponding Makefile.am.  Is this an
| oversight?

Yes, oops, that's quite unintentional.

Can you see if it works better if you do

ac_cv_prog_RST2MAN=rst2man.py ./configure

?
-- 
Tollef Fog Heen
Varnish Software
t: +47 21 98 62 64



From des at des.no  Mon Oct 25 16:08:15 2010
From: des at des.no (=?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?=)
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:08:15 +0200
Subject: rst2man
In-Reply-To: <87pquyhdy6.fsf@qurzaw.linpro.no> (Tollef Fog Heen's message of
	"Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:30:25 +0200")
References: <868w1r7f3o.fsf@ds4.des.no> <87pquyhdy6.fsf@qurzaw.linpro.no>
Message-ID: <86hbgab6hc.fsf@ds4.des.no>

Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen at varnish-software.com> writes:
> Can you see if it works better if you do
>
> ac_cv_prog_RST2MAN=rst2man.py ./configure
>
> ?

Umm, the correct variable is RST2MAN, not ac_cv_prog_RST2MAN - and since
the files are already there, you can set it to anything (e.g. "true") to
fool the test - but that's a workaround, not a fix.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav - des at des.no